Editorial
Goodwill is often Ignored when trading with the third world.
A number of manufacturers try to protect their brand names, especially when manufacturing has been transferred offshore.
However, the same cannot be said of those destined for some third world countries
To some, the third world only deserves those which have failed the quality control tests to the more developed countries' markets.
These manufacturers are actually "debranding" themselves as their products will not grow with the 3rd world markets where growth prospects are not only very high, but many products are already being branded by their countries of origin, where price differences can be as high as 400%.
The topic considers many aspects of Goodwill from branding to goodwill figures in financial statements.
We may want to know the relevance of this to trade with third world countries or emerging economies.
In Nigeria, for example, a manufacturer's goodwill can account, in some cases for more than 200% premium in the price of products like human or veterinary drugs and medications, vehicle and machinery parts. Premium on electronic goods like a mobile telephone handset are much less, but are still substantial.What gives rise to goodwill?
| Medication | Brand Name | Maker | Price | Unknown Brand Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ampicillin/ Cloxacillin | Ampiclox | Beecham | N500 (US$3.25) | N100 |
| Chloroquine/ Artesunate | Camoquine | Roche | N760 (US$5.00) | N550 |
| Paracetamol | Panadol | GSK | N50 (US$0.34) | N30 |
Most
pharmacies in Nigeria stock both products, to take care of some who
will never buy an unknown brand, as well as those who cannot afford a
known brand, as income gaps can be very wide.
The
issue of substandard and fake drugs has always been very
contentious in Nigeria.
A
strategic move to locate production close to major markets or supply
chain should be differentiated from one where low labour costs serves as
the main incentive. Movement to some other countries may enhance
goodwill, where those countries are noted for quality products,
standards enforcement etc.
Transferring production overseas must
be followed by the transfer or existence of an equally reliable supply
chain in the new location in terms of quality. The failure of this may reduce
goodwill. Producers must always consider the extra investment
required to sustain brand goodwill when production base shifts,
So, why do many businesses with goodwill in their
financial statements loose market share to companies which produce
cheaper products?
This
is because many cannot effectively manage goodwill, as they do not
understand its dynamics. The sustained demand for a product with
goodwill attracts a premium price over the competition. High prices
normally attract new entrants who attempt to offer the same product or
equivalent at a lower price, thus increasing supply.
Failure to respond
with a price reduction gives the new entrant an easy access to the
market resulting in a loss of market share in spite of the goodwill.
They should therefore respond to constantly reducing prices of
competitors by reducing their own prices while still keeping the
premiums constant, or even reducing such.
This is because the percentage premium which serves as goodwill, gives
considerable latitude in a price war, as new entrants rarely factor in
this possibility (price war) when submitting business plans to investors
and lenders.
If this does not cripple
the competition, then the business must consider re engineering and
restructuring its production, and/or its product or production
technology, as the loss of market share might be a result of disruptive
technology, to which every business must respond. (Refer to the
Swatch experience).
Why
then do companies often write down goodwill acquired from another
company after a merger or acquisition?
Many
businesses regard a merger or acquisition merely as the removal of a
stubborn competitor from the market. In as much as they try to take over
its market share, they end up having to write down what was paid for
goodwill without a commensurate increase in sales and profitability.
Businesses must investigate thoroughly, the factors that have given rise
to the goodwill they intend to pay for when acquiring another business.
They must understand its dynamics to know if they can make their own
structure flexible enough to take advantage of such, if those factors
are still relevant.
Conclusion
Many
businesses in the developed countries have wound up, or incurred heavy
losses simply because they cannot leverage the goodwill in their
businesses when competing against what they see as competition from low
wage countries.
This, in turn, is because they have not exploited
the opportunities available in trade with third world and emerging
economies to the full.
(Example: sales of American cars in China)Tagging
on some of these markets may reduce marginal production costs, and, by
implication, prices through increased economics of scale.
Some of
these may be mundane efforts such as little modifications to goods for
certain destinations, inexpensive concessions to some customers/clients
who are also opinion leaders, databases of profitable customers, or
simple marketing procedures in some markets.
Many Nigerians traders
and consumers are fiercely loyal to some brand names because of their
limited education, as they find it very difficult to compare
specifications. You will be surprised to know that many auto mechanics
and technicians still refer to wheel and engine bearings as
"Boris" after a brand that existed in the 1960s and 70s.
Goodwill,
acquired through brand reputations, or country of origin, may be more
valuable than what is usually acknowledged while trading with the
developing world.